You can go to our Newsletters .
Or search for a word here:
Text to Search For:
Boolean: Case


MIT Women Win Fight Against Bias

Women professors at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology presumed that their numbers were low for the reason everyone had accepted as fact: Girls just don't like science. Then they took out their tape measures. Sneaking around the nation's most prestigious institute of science in 1994, 15 women went office to office comparing how much space MIT awarded women with that of men of equal status. It was less by about half. Salaries were less too. As was the research money given women. And the numbers of women on committees that made decisions about hiring and funding. There were no women department heads and never had been. And while MIT lavished raises on men who got job offers elsewhere, it simply let the women leave.
Like most universities facing complaints of bias, MIT at first resisted the women's charges of inequity. But unlike schools that have waited for lawsuits to act, MIT did something rare in academia: The institute looked at the numbers and admitted it was wrong.
In an extraordinary admission, top officials at MIT issued a report acknowledging that female professors at MIT have suffered from pervasive, if unintentional discrimination. "I have always believed that contemporary gender discrimination within universities is part reality and part perception," the university's president Charles M. Vest, said. "True, but I now understand that reality is by far the greater part of the balance.'
The report found that in 1994 in biology, undergraduate women numbered 147, compared with 142 men, but the sex balance shifted as status advanced so that at the highest level of faculty, there were only 7 women and 42 men.
Martha S. West, a professor of law at UC Davis said of the report, 'what's amazing is the president's acknowledgment that there is a scientific basis for our continued perception that things are not good for us. My perception is that things have been getting worse, not better for women over the last 10 years."

-wage@wage.org-